Uganda Law Society Warns Against Extending Political Terms to 7 Years
Kampala, Uganda – The Uganda Law Society (ULS) has strongly opposed proposals to extend parliamentary and executive terms from five to seven years, warning that the move could undermine democracy and trigger legal challenges.
Speaking on Next Radio’s Big Talk, ULS Vice President Anthony Asiimwe stated that the legal fraternity would resist any constitutional amendment that appears self-serving or fails to meet democratic standards.
“If this rumor of a seven-year term has any truth, we will oppose it unless it passes the constitutional litmus test,” Asiimwe said. He emphasized that while amendments are legal, those that erode public trust or manipulate term limits for political gain would face fierce opposition.
Constitutional Concerns and Political Backlash
The proposal has sparked heated debate, with critics accusing lawmakers of attempting to entrench themselves in power. Opposition leaders, including Ibrahim Ssemujju Nganda, condemned the idea as self-serving.
“These are selfish individuals who just want to stay in office longer,” Ssemujju said. “You cannot benefit from a law you’re pushing for.”
Meanwhile, Kagoma North MP Alex Brandon Kintu acknowledged that discussions around term extensions have taken place within government circles but insisted that Parliament would not pass laws solely for its own benefit.
“Parliament knows it cannot enact laws that directly favor its members,” Kintu said. “Even if proposed, such changes wouldn’t apply to the current Parliament.”
Government Review Under Scrutiny
Justice Minister Norbert Mao confirmed that the proposal is part of a broader constitutional review led by the Uganda Law Reform Commission.
“After 30 years, it’s time for an inclusive and transparent review of the Constitution,” Mao stated.
However, legal experts and civil society groups remain skeptical. Political analyst Yusuf Serunkuma questioned the motive behind the amendment, asking:
“What problem is this solving? Extending terms risks reducing accountability and increasing misuse of power.”
Legal and Democratic Risks
Critics argue that longer terms could weaken checks and balances, allowing officials to operate with less public oversight. Mityana South MP Richard Lumu also raised legal concerns, citing constitutional protections against legislative interference in judicial matters.
The debate has reignited tensions over Uganda’s constitutional history, including past amendments on presidential age and term limits. Civil society groups are now calling for a transparent review process that prioritizes governance reforms—not political self-preservation.
As discussions continue, the Uganda Law Society has vowed to challenge any amendments that threaten democratic principles.
— Reported by Nexio News
