Nigerian Court Orders Activist Omoyele Sowore to Defend Cyberbullying Charges Against President Tinubu
A Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that Nigerian activist and journalist Omoyele Sowore must face trial over allegations of cyberbullying President Bola Tinubu. Justice Mohammed Garba Umar dismissed Sowore’s no-case submission, stating that prosecutors had presented sufficient evidence to warrant a defense.
The case, filed by Nigeria’s Department of State Services (DSS), stems from a social media post Sowore allegedly made, which authorities claim contained derogatory remarks about the president. The court found that the prosecution successfully established a prima facie case, meaning Sowore must now explain the accusations in detail.
Court’s Reasoning
Justice Umar emphasized that at this stage, the court’s role was not to assess witness credibility but to determine whether the evidence presented justified proceeding with the trial. A prosecution witness reportedly testified that Sowore published the contentious post from his verified social media account.
“The interest of justice would not be served by terminating this case now,” Justice Umar stated. He directed Sowore to enter his defense, setting the stage for further legal arguments.
Prosecutors, citing Section 396(6) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), urged the court to compel Sowore to immediately begin his defense.
Background and Reactions
Sowore, a prominent human rights campaigner and former presidential candidate, has faced multiple legal battles with Nigerian authorities. Supporters argue the case is politically motivated, while the government maintains it is enforcing laws against online defamation and cyberbullying.
Legal analysts suggest the ruling signals the judiciary’s reluctance to dismiss high-profile cases prematurely, especially those involving public officials. However, free speech advocates warn that such prosecutions could stifle dissent.
What’s Next?
With the no-case submission rejected, Sowore must now present his defense in court. If convicted, he could face penalties under Nigeria’s cybercrime laws, though the specifics depend on further proceedings.
The case has drawn attention to Nigeria’s legal approach to digital speech, particularly concerning criticism of political leaders. Observers will be watching closely as the trial unfolds.
— Reported by Nexio News
