Kenya’s Deputy President Seeks to Cross-Examine Cardiologist in Gachagua Impeachment Case
Nairobi, Kenya — Deputy President Kithure Kindiki has filed an application in Kenya’s High Court, requesting permission to question a prominent cardiologist over disputed medical evidence linked to the impeachment case against former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
The legal move targets Dr. Daniel Kibuka Gikonyo, who submitted a supplementary affidavit on April 28, 2024, containing medical records related to alleged events from October 2023. Kindiki argues that the late introduction of these documents—nearly 18 months after the fact—raises serious questions that can only be resolved through cross-examination.
Disputed Medical Evidence
The case, filed under Petition No. E565 of 2024, challenges the legality of Gachagua’s impeachment by Kenya’s Senate. Kindiki’s legal team contends that Dr. Gikonyo’s affidavit introduces contested medical and factual claims that were never presented during the Senate proceedings.
“The medical records attached to this affidavit were conspicuously absent during the impeachment hearings,” Kindiki’s application states. “Their sudden appearance demands scrutiny—especially since the petitioners had already closed their case.”
Key Questions Raised
Kindiki’s lawyers are pushing for the court to examine:
- When and how the medical examination was conducted.
- Why the records were not disclosed earlier to the Senate or High Court.
- The authenticity and reliability of the documents.
Without cross-examination, the Deputy President argues, there is no way to verify the credibility of the cardiologist’s claims.
Legal Implications
The impeachment of Rigathi Gachagua has been a contentious issue in Kenyan politics, with critics alleging procedural flaws. Kindiki’s latest move signals a deeper legal battle over the evidence used in the Senate’s decision.
“The delayed submission of these medical records creates a cloud of doubt,” a legal analyst familiar with the case told Nexio News. “Cross-examination is crucial to determine whether this evidence holds weight or if it’s an attempt to sway the court unfairly.”
What Happens Next?
The High Court will now decide whether to grant Kindiki’s request to question Dr. Gikonyo. If approved, the cross-examination could shed new light on the validity of the impeachment process.
The outcome may also set a precedent for how late-submitted evidence is treated in Kenya’s judicial system, particularly in politically charged cases.
— Reported by Nexio News
